![]() ![]() The traffic violations bureau was established in the City Court of Atlanta, pursuant to the authority of OCGA § 40-13-50 et seq. The sentencing order contained in the record on appeal also specified that upon default of such payment, a six-month period of incarceration is to be imposed. Geng was tried before a judge in the traffic violations bureau, was found guilty of speeding, and was fined $315. ![]() XI of the Georgia Constitution, and denied him equal protection of the law under both the federal and Georgia Constitutions reconsideration was denied. Geng moved for reconsideration, asserting that the deprivation of trial by jury violated Art. His demand was denied and his case was transferred to the City Court of Atlanta traffic violations bureau for disposition. He filed a proper written demand for jury trial in that court. Geng was ordered to appear to answer the charge in the City Court of Atlanta. This offense constitutes a misdemeanor under state law. The citation charged Geng with violating OCGA § 40-6-181 of Georgia's Motor Vehicle Code in that he was driving his vehicle 80 mph in an area with a posted speed limit of 55 mph. Geng was stopped by a City of Atlanta police officer and was issued a uniform traffic citation for speeding. XI of the Georgia Constitution, we reverse the judgment below. Because Geng was entitled to trial by jury in accordance with Art. John Geng, Jr., appeals his conviction for speeding, challenging the constitutionality of the statutes upon which the trial court relied in denying his request for a jury trial. *116 Davis, Zipperman, Kirschenbaum & Lotito, Nicholas A. Drolet, Solicitor-Gen., Katherine Diamandis, Asst. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |